Published 24 May 07
Strategic
Interests
by J.
Peter Pham,
Ph.D.
World
Defense
Review
columnist
PRINTER-FRIENDLY
VERSION
Smokin' on Somalia
Last week, my colleague at the Foundation for the Defense of
Democracies
(FDD),
Andrew
McCarthy –
the former
Assistant
United
States
Attorney for
the Southern
District of
New York who
led the
prosecution
of "Blind
Sheikh" Omar
Abdel Rahman
as well as
the bombings
of the U.S.
embassies in
Kenya and
Tanzania and
who now
heads FDD's
Center for
Law and
Counterterrorism
– forwarded
to me some
interesting
material on
Operation
Somali
Justice,
the Drug
Enforcement
Administration's
18-month
nationwide
attempt to
crack down
on the
traffic in
qat
(also known
as khat).
The
flowering
shrub
indigenous
to the Horn
of Africa
yields
masses of
ubiquitous
evergreen
leaves which
are chewed
by the
peoples of
the region,
especially
the Somalis,
for its
naturally
occurring
alkaloid
cathinone,
an
amphetamine-like
stimulant
whose
affects on
its users
vary from
manic
hyperactivity
characterized
by unrealism
and emotion
instability
to drowsy
hallucinations
marked by
depression
and
lethargy.
Following
developments
in U.S.
policy
towards the
geopolitically
sensitive
subregion of
the Horn,
one might be
tempted to
wonder if
most of the
25 tons of
qat
which the
traffickers
– 44 were
charged in
the Southern
District
Court of New
York while
18 others
were
indicted in
Seattle –
were accused
of smuggling
into the
American
might not
have been
delivered
(and
consumed) in
government
offices
inside the
Washington
Beltway.
|
|

Dr. Pham testifying before two Congressional subcommittees
on
U.S.
policy
in
the
Horn
of
Africa
on
May
10,
2007. |
On May
10, I
testified
before the
U.S. House
of
Representatives.
At a joint
hearing held
under the
aegis of the
Committee on
Foreign
Affairs, the
Subcommittee
on
International
Organizations,
Human Rights
and
Oversight
and the
Subcommittee
on Africa
and Global
Health
examined
American
relations
with the
Federal
Democratic
Republic of
Ethiopia.
While I used
the
opportunity
to speak on
"Responsible
U.S. Policy
Toward
Ethiopia:
Context,
Challenges,
and
Opportunities
of a
Strategically
Vital
Relationship,"
it was
pretty clear
that I was
rather alone
in taking
the view
that the
government
of Prime
Minister
Meles Zenawi
was one
"with which
we can work"
and, its
flaws
notwithstanding,
remains a
reliable
partner who
has not only
"advanced
our
interests in
the Horn of
Africa in
recent
months" but
also, with
the
exception of
Uganda, been
the only
country to
put forward
resources to
support
international
efforts at
stabilization
in Somalia.
I took my
share of
hits for my
politically
incorrect
assessment
both at the
hearing from
congressmen
of both
parties and
subsequently
as a torrent
of
correspondence
poured in
from critics
of the
Ethiopian
government.
In the end,
I did not
even have to
wait one
week for
vindication
of my point.
On May 15,
Prime
Minister
Meles gave
an interview
in which,
citing the
"onerous
financial
burden" of
operations,
he stated he
was
withdrawing
his troops
from Somalia
where they
had
intervened
in December
to drive the
al-Qaeda-linked
Islamic
Courts Union
from power
and have
remained
ever since
to prop up
the
internationally-recognized
but utterly
ineffectual
"Transitional
Federal
Government"
(TFG). The
chair of the
African
Union
Commission,
Alpha Oumar
Konaré,
quickly
declared
that "if
Ethiopia
withdrew
from Somalia
today, it
would be a
catastrophe,"
while U.S.
Assistant
Secretary of
State for
African
Affairs
Jendayi E.
Frazier said
it would be
a "mistake"
for Ethiopia
to pull out
and all but
begged the
Ethiopians
to stay put.
Two days
later,
Secretary of
State
Condoleeza
Rice
announced
the
appointment
of a retired
career
diplomat,
Ambassador
John M.
Yates, as
special
envoy to
Somalia with
a mandate to
"represent
the United
States with
the
Transitional
Federal
Institutions"
in order to
"contribute
to the peace
and
stability of
the Horn of
Africa."
Rice
characterized
the
appointment
as being in
support of
an effort by
the people
of Somalia
to use the
TFG as the
vehicle to
develop
their
national
institutions
and overcome
the legacy
of violence
and disorder
of the
past."
Unfortunately,
someone
neglected to
tell the
warring
Somali clans
in
Mogadishu: a
car bomb
killed four
Ugandan
soldiers
taking part
in the
woefully
undermanned
African
Union
Mission in
Somalia
(AMISOM)
"peacekeeping"
operation
just one day
before Dr.
Rice named
her envoy
and, at
almost the
very same
time the
appointment
was being
made in
Washington,
TFG "Prime
Minister"
Ali Mohammed
Ghedi
narrowly
escaped
another bomb
as he
escorted the
bodies of
the Ugandans
to the
airport; a
few days
earlier,
United
Nations
Under-Secretary-General
for
Humanitarian
Affairs John
Holmes cut
short his
visit to the
former
Somali
capital
after yet
another bomb
went off 300
meters from
the UN
building,
killing
three
Somalis.
The
supreme
irony of
Secretary
Rice in
dispatching
an envoy to
the TFG on a
permanent
basis – last
month Dr.
Frazier
visited
Baidoa, the
provincial
outback
where the
rump
"regime"
pretends to
rule
Somalia, but
only stayed
for a few
hours – is
that, for
all the Bush
administration's
emphasis on
democracy
promotion
and
antiterrorism
efforts, the
TFG is, as I
have
repeatedly
demonstrated
in this
column space
(see, most
recently,
my April 12
column,
"Peacekeepers
with No
Peace to
Keep"),
a motley
collection
of
self-appointed
warlords who
enjoy little
support and
even less
political
legitimacy
among their
long-suffering
countrymen –
and that is
putting it
charitably.
An article
by a veteran
U.S.
diplomat
published in
the American
Foreign
Service
Association's
influential
Foreign
Service
Journal
recently
described
the TFG in
unusually
candid terms
as "impotent
and
corrupt."
The sending
a retired
ambassador
to treat
with the
phantasmal
TFG
"government"
in order to
promote
"peace and
stability"
crosses the
line between
the farcical
and tragic,
however,
when it
privileges a
pointless
mission
while
simultaneously
perpetuating
the
Department
of State's
pusillanimous
non-engagement
with the one
part of the
former
Somalia
which not
has a
democratically
elected
government
but also a
secular
polity that
is a beacon
of stability
in the
region, the
Republic of
Somaliland,
which even
hailed in
the title of
aforementioned
Foreign
Service
Journal
article as a
"democracy
under
threat."
Two
months ago,
I
outlined
three
essential
points for
realistic
policy with
respect to
Somalia.
These remain
unaltered by
recent
developments
because they
are grounded
in the
realities of
the Somali
clans, their
history, and
political
aspirations:
-
Recognition
of the
"wholesale
rejection
by
Somali
clans of
the TFG
as well
as any
foreign
forces
which
are
viewed
as
shoring
up that
pretender
government…
Stop
wasting
time,
money,
political
capital,
and,
now,
lives on
the
TFG."
-
Acceptance
of the
fact
that
"there
is no
hope of
outsiders
being
able to
reconstitute
a
unitary
Somali
state."
Somalilanders
will
never
agree to
turn
back the
clock
and
reenter
into a
union
with the
rest of
the
country.
The
inhabitants
of the
semi-autonomous
northeastern
region
of
Puntland
have
likewise
shown
themselves
unwilling
to chain
their
destiny
to that
to the
anarchic
rest of
the
former
state.
Consequently,
"short
of
employing
overwhelming
brutal
force –
and,
even
then,
the odds
of
success
are not
good –
there is
little
likelihood
that
Humpty
Dumpty
can be
put back
together
again."
-
Realization
that the
primary
strategic
objective
of the
international
community
"must
therefore
be to
prevent
both
outside
actors
from
exploiting
the
vacuum
left by
the
de facto
extinction
of the
entity
formerly
known as
Somalia
and
those
inside
the
onetime
state
from
spreading
their
insecurity
throughout
a
geopolitically
sensitive
region."
While on
a purely
secondary
level
the
international
community
might
also be
interested
in
facilitating
progress
inside
the
failed
state,
"outsiders'
chief
interests
will be
allocating
their
scarce
resources
where
they can
achieve
some
effect."
This last
point is
particularly
important
because
actual
resources
are even
scarcer than
political
will to
become
involved in
the Somali
imbroglio:
almost six
months after
a unanimous
UN Security
Council
first
authorized
an African
peacekeeping
mission only
Uganda's
President
Yoweri
Museveni has
stepped
forward to
make a real
contribution
to the
force, the
now
embattled
1,200
seasoned
troops under
the command
of Major
General Levi
Karuhunga.
Despite
repeated
assurances
of their
commitment,
the other
countries
which have
pledged
troops –
Burundi,
Ghana,
Malawi, and
Nigeria –
have yet to
send so much
as platoon,
leaving
AMISOM
woefully
under its
authorized
strength of
8,000. And,
as I noted
in
my January
25 column,
"even if
U.S. and
European
envoys
manage to
cajole other
countries
into
contributing
the rest of
the 8,000
peacekeepers
to take the
place of the
withdrawing
Ethiopian
intervention
force, it is
beyond
delusional
to think
that such a
modest
contingent
of Africans
can succeed
where the
infinitely
more robust
UNITAF and
UNOSOM II
forces, with
their 37,000
and 28,000
personnel
respectively,
failed
barely a
decade ago."
In the
final
analysis,
the only
true
national
interest
that the
United
States has
in Somalia
is ensuring
that foreign
non-state
actors such
as al-Qaeda
as well as
state
sponsors of
terrorism or
other
spoiler
states such
as Eritrea
do not avail
themselves
of the
carcass of
the onetime
state breed
the maggots
of their
instability
and radical
Islamist
ideology.
While an
effective
Somali
central
government
could
potentially
be a help in
this regard,
it is not a
prerequisite.
A policy of
containment
can achieve
the same
strategic
effect by a
continuing
partnership
with
Ethiopia
which has a
strong
vested
interest in
preventing
spillover, a
long-overdue
recognition
of the
democratically
elected and
politically
legitimate
authorities
in
Somaliland,
and a
redeployment
of AMISOM
along the
boundaries
of the
former
Somali
Democratic
Republic
while
beefing up
the African
force's
capabilities.
And the U.S.
Combined
Joint Task
Force-Horn
of Africa
(CJTF-HOA)
based in
nearby
Djibouti
should
certainly
continue and
even expand
its efforts
to help
build these
local
capacities
even as it
remains
ready to
take
preemptive
action
against
terrorist
threats
should our
partners
prove
themselves
unwilling or
simply
unable to do
so.
The
"offshore"
approach I
advocate
would not
only give
Somalis the
time and
space within
which to
exercise
their
self-determination
concerning
the shape
that their
political
future(s)
ought to
assume, but
it would
also more
directly and
realistically
address the
key interest
of other
countries,
especially
the
neighboring
states in
the Horn of
Africa,
their
concern
about
spreading
insecurity.
Furthermore,
this realist
foreign
policy
enjoys, at
the state
level, the
advantage of
being
dependent on
neither
manic
hyperactivity
nor
exaggerated
paralysis,
behavioral
symptoms
which, in
individual
physiology,
can be
indicative
of smoking –
or chewing –
psychoactive
drugs on the
DEA's
Schedule I
for
controlled
substances.
– J. Peter Pham is Director of the
Nelson
Institute
for
International
and Public
Affairs
and a
Research
Fellow of
the
Institute
for
Infrastructure
and
Information
Assurance at
James
Madison
University
in
Harrisonburg,
Virginia. He
is also an
adjunct
fellow at
the
Foundation
for the
Defense of
Democracies
in
Washington,
D.C. In
addition to
the study of
terrorism
and
political
violence,
his research
interests
lie at the
intersection
of
international
relations,
international
law,
political
theory, and
ethics, with
particular
concentrations
on the
implications
for United
States
foreign
policy and
African
states as
well as
religion and
global
politics.
Dr.
Pham is the
author of
over one
hundred
essays and
reviews on a
wide variety
of subjects
in scholarly
and opinion
journals on
both sides
of the
Atlantic and
the author,
editor, or
translator
of over a
dozen books.
Among his
recent
publications
are
Liberia:
Portrait of
a Failed
State
(Reed Press,
2004), which
has been
critically
acclaimed by
Foreign
Affairs,
Worldview,
Wilson
Quarterly,
American
Foreign
Policy
Interests,
and other
scholarly
publications,
and
Child
Soldiers,
Adult
Interests:
The Global
Dimensions
of the
Sierra
Leonean
Tragedy
(Nova
Science
Publishers,
2005).
In
addition to
serving on
the boards
of several
international
and national
think tanks
and
journals,
Dr. Pham has
testified
before the
U.S.
Congress and
conducted
briefings or
consulted
for both
Congressional
and
Executive
agencies. He
is also a
frequent
contributor
to National
Review
Online's
military
blog, The
Tank.
© 2007 J. Peter Pham |